[av_one_full first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’ animation=”]
[av_heading heading=’ VIEWPOINTS | Partial divorce?’ tag=’h3′ style=’blockquote modern-quote’ size=” subheading_active=’subheading_below’ subheading_size=’15’ padding=’10’ color=” custom_font=”]
BY OSCAR CRUZ
[/av_heading]
[av_textblock size=” font_color=’custom’ color=”]
Friday, April 7, 2017
[/av_textblock]
[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=”]
sad to know and be aware of the fact that there are a good number of incumbent public officials in the national level of government who are bent on fooling around with, if not doing their best, in effectively destroying the nature and finalities of marriage as stipulated by Natural Law and affirmed by ethical principles.
This phenomenon has particular relevance to the ruling administration together with its well-rewarded allies in the Legislative Department. It must be admitted that they are not simply sly but also ingenious in their common venture to destroy the fundamental assumptions as well as the essential finalities of such a sacred and serious institution as the Marriage Covenant which is definitely and categorically very much more than a mere contract in line with the business norm of “No exchange. No return.” Instead of “OK to Change and Return.”
Among the well-designed and accordingly desired legislations, the following take precedence: population control, divorce and same-sex marriage.
They already have succeeded in undermining the significance and implications of Responsible Parenthood by the so-called “Reproductive Health Law” which is precisely against human reproduction, not to mention the abortive accompanying features thereof. One thing worth noting is that those against human reproduction are already reproduced by their parents.
And here now comes the enigmatic “Partial Divorce” – or something the like. A divorce that is but “Partial” and wherefore “Total” it is not?
Does that mean that there would be such a thing as “Partial Marriage” as well – partial husband and wife, partial marital life, partial parental relationship? Amusing!
The truth of the matter is: When a marriage is between a foreigner and a Filipino citizen, in the event that the former files for and obtains a divorce, then the latter is legally held capable of re-marrying too.
How many divorces one may file and obtain, how many remarriages one may enter into – this is not yet stipulated as of now. (Cf. Family Code of the Philippines, Art. 26, pars. 1 and 2)
Interesting!/PN
[/av_textblock]
[/av_one_full]
