THE RECENT dismissal of a police officer in Negros Occidental for using illegal drugs is a disquieting revelation that not only tarnishes the badge but also raises profound concerns about the integrity of law enforcement institutions tasked with the societal mandate to “protect and serve.” This case within the Police Regional Office 6 (PRO-6) brings to the forefront an issue that strikes at the heart of public trust in the police force — a trust that is indispensable for the effective administration of justice.
Policemen, by virtue of their role, are held to higher standards of conduct and ethical behavior. They are expected to be paragons of lawfulness and discipline, given their powers to enforce the law, make arrests, and carry firearms. When these enforcers become users, or worse, pushers of illicit substances, it creates a paradox that undermines the very fabric of our legal system. It begs the question: How can one uphold the law when they, themselves, break it?
The implications of police officers hooked on illegal drugs are grave and manifold. First, it compromises their ability to perform their duties effectively. Judgment, reaction time, and decision-making are all impaired under the influence of drugs, leading to a heightened risk of wrongful arrests, excessive use of force, and, ultimately, miscarriages of justice. Second, it puts the officer’s colleagues and the public at risk. An addict officer is a liability in volatile situations that require a sober and measured response. Third, it corrupts the institution. Officers under the influence are susceptible to bribery, coercion, and could become conduits for the drug trade they are supposed to dismantle.
The case in Negros Occidental is not an isolated incident, and it’s naïve to treat it as such. It should be a wake-up call for a comprehensive review and overhaul of the systems in place. The PRO-6’s response — swift dismissal following due process — is a step in the right direction, but it is merely reactive. A proactive stance is crucial in weeding out this malaise.
There should be frequent and random drug testing. While 5,694 officers were tested, and only two tested positive, these numbers should not provide comfort. Testing should be unpredictable and widespread to deter use and provide a clearer picture of the scope of the problem.
There should be ongoing education about the risks of drug use, and training in stress management to provide officers with alternatives to cope with the pressures of the job. Offering counseling services and establishing support groups can help officers struggling with substance abuse before it escalates to a level requiring disciplinary action.
Of course, there must be a clear and enforced zero-tolerance policy for drug use within the police force, but it should be coupled with rehabilitation pathways for those who seek help before being caught.
The breach of public trust by a police officer using illegal drugs is a serious infraction that must be met with unequivocal corrective action. Trust in the police is not a given; it is earned and must be constantly reaffirmed through the highest standards of conduct. Anything less is a disservice to the law-abiding citizens and the many officers who perform their duties with honor and integrity.
