BY FR. SHAY CULLEN
IN ONE of its recent singular success stories, the International Criminal Court (ICC) brought about the arrest, trial and sentencing of Bosco Ntaganda. He was found “guilty beyond reasonable doubt” of crimes against humanity for killing numerous people, committing war crimes, sexually abusing many women and children in his sex slavery ring.
Bosco Ntaganda was a warlord in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). He was sentenced to 30 years in prison on November 7, 2019. He was convicted of committing murders individually and on a large scale.
The ICC does not have a brilliant record of success despite having a huge staff of lawyers, investigators, researchers and a massive budget to pay them and to support witnesses. The court has indicted 44 individuals and 45 cases are presently being tried by the ICC.
Out of the 45 cases, only 14 have had a complete proceeding. In 21 years, there have been only nine convictions in the ICC since it first began in 2001.
The ICC was established in July 1998 at a conference held in Rome by the United Nations where more than sixty nations ratified the ICC in an international treaty known as the Rome Statute. The intention and goal of the court was to end impunity by individuals and groups who are responsible for mass killings, atrocities, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. It grew out of the first international trials at Nuremberg in Germany held after World War II to try the Nazi leaders who murdered millions of people including the genocide of the Jews and other groups.
Then, it was said that such terrible crimes would never be allowed to happen again in a civilized world where the dignity and rights of the human person would be protected and “Never Again” was the rallying cry to end war crimes and genocide. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights then followed.
The world community did not fully civilize. Many nations did not respect human rights and dignity. They did not end oppression and crimes against humanity. Human nature, driven by greed and the lust for power, brought leaders and their cronies to political power backed by corrupt business people. These leaders have continued to kill and oppress their own people.
The International Criminal Court was established to bring them to justice as a deterrent and prevent more war crimes and mass killing and atrocities. But it has failed miserably in that regard because it is a slow ponderous body with too few convictions. The killings still go on as we can see in Ethiopia, Yemen, the DRC, Syria, Belarus, Myanmar, Mali, Nigeria and allegedly the Philippines.
In 2021, the ICC declared that “Specific legal element of the crime against humanity of murder’ has been met in the crackdown that killed thousands in Philippines.” They also said that the “so-called ‘war on drugs’ campaign cannot be seen as a legitimate law enforcement operation, and the killings neither as legitimate nor as mere excesses in an otherwise legitimate operation.”
The question is, how can the ICC investigators prove that it was not a legitimate campaign to eliminate the evil drug trade operated by criminal gangs and drug traffickers at the highest level of society?
Anyway, the ICC has no power to enforce its mandate to investigate such alleged crimes if the Philippine government does not cooperate.
The ICC has to have state cooperation or it has no jurisdiction./PN
