THE CURRENT plight of Ilonggo overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) in Lebanon, caught in the throes of conflict, calls for robust support systems that not only respond but also actively prepare these workers for crises.
The Provincial Government of Iloilo, through its Public Employment Service Office (PESO), has laid a good foundation with its comprehensive support structure for OFWs. Programs under the Overseas Filipinos Migration and Development Center—ranging from the Bulig Ilonggo Help Desk, which offers daily case intake, to financial and psycho-social support — are good. Yet, the ongoing situation in Lebanon reveals the gaps that need bridging to elevate these supports from good to great.
While PESO-Iloilo’s initiative to provide P10,000 under the Financial Assistance to Repatriated OFWs (PAR-OFWs) program is a welcome relief, this amount may be insufficient considering the high costs of resettlement and restarting lives. An evaluation of financial needs based on the current economic climate and a corresponding adjustment in financial aid could provide more meaningful support to the repatriated individuals.
The provision of psycho-social support, such as the PRIME program, is also crucial, yet its efficacy hinges on long-term engagement rather than one-off counseling sessions. Establishing ongoing mental health support that extends beyond the immediate aftermath of crisis situations can help mitigate long-term trauma and facilitate smoother social reintegration for OFWs.
Ah yes, the activation of 24/7 emergency hotlines is a vital component of crisis response. However, enhancing these channels to include more proactive communication strategies could further improve their effectiveness. Regular updates, information on safety protocols abroad, and real-time assistance during emergencies should be standardized.
And while initiatives like the Expanded Micro-Business Recovery Assistance During Crisis and Emergency (EMBRACE) are commendable, there is a significant opportunity to expand these programs. Tailored business coaching, market access support, and sustainability models could turn these financial aids into long-term success stories for returning OFWs.
Bur we have to emphasize this: the local government’s role does not end with program implementation. There is a need for advocacy at higher levels of government to ensure that the rights and welfare of OFWs are prioritized in both bilateral agreements and international policies. The evolving global landscape demands dynamic and responsive adjustments to PESO-Iloilo’s programs for distressed OFWs. We must safeguard our most vulnerable and valiant workers who brave uncertain conditions abroad to build a better future for their families at home.
