IN TODAY’S rapidly changing world, “wokeness” often dominates discussions around social justice. While the movement aims to promote social justice and human rights, it can sometimes deepen divides and alienate people.
Critics like David Brooks argue that the issue often lies in how wokeness is applied rather than the causes it supports. Understanding these criticisms is essential to avoid falling into the trap of using wokeness in ways that might backfire anew.
Consider the transgender rights movement. The push for transgender acceptance is crucial, but sometimes, the conversation is shut down before it starts, primarily when issues on shared spaces, fair competition, and transition anxiety are raised. Labeling these concerns as transphobic without engaging in dialogue has alienated potential allies.
Similarly, the debate around the SOGIE Bill often paints any opposition as bigotry or narrow-mindedness, missing opportunities for meaningful discussion and compromise in matters such as legal overreach and balancing the rights of others. This approach risks losing the support of those who might otherwise be sympathetic.
Wokeness also impacts how we view socio-cultural traditions. In a rush to modernize, long-held customs, like the Santacruzan, Translacion, religious piety, respect for the elders, or traditions that seemingly border on cultural appropriation, gender roles, dress codes, or patriarchy, are criticized for being repressive, dogmatic, or objectifying, without considering their more profound religious or socio-cultural context and significance. This can lead to superficial critiques that overlook the depth of these traditions to the communities that uphold them.
In the workplace, wokeness can have unintended consequences. Diversity initiatives, though well-intentioned, can sometimes emphasize representation over merit, leading to tokenism and a less effective team.
True inclusivity should prioritize skills, talent, and the right fit for the role, rather than simply ticking diversity boxes. When inclusivity efforts seem forced or superficial, they create a fragile sense of unity that easily falls apart under pressure.
Being woke can sometimes result in overprotection, as parents shield their kids from difficulties in real life in an effort to instill social awareness in them. Despite its good intentions, this method may keep children from growing the resilience necessary to deal with the challenges of life.
Rather than growing from setbacks, they might pass up chances to interact with diverse viewpoints, exercise critical thought, and develop empathy. This risks creating a generation that is socially conscious but less equipped to handle adversity. (To be continued)/PN
