AS THE 2025 national and local elections approach, it is crucial to safeguard government programs from being misused for political gain. The Department of Labor and Employment’s (DOLE) recent reiteration that the Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged Workers (TUPAD) Program is not affiliated with any political party or candidate is a reminder of the need for vigilance against electioneering disguised as public service.
TUPAD is a vital program that provides temporary employment to disadvantaged workers. It is meant to serve those in need, not as a tool for politicians to secure votes. However, history has shown that well-intended social welfare programs are often repackaged as campaign giveaways. Politicians, particularly those seeking re-election, have been known to take credit for government projects, using them to build goodwill and expand their political base.
DOLE has been proactive in discouraging any form of political interference in TUPAD’s implementation. Guidelines strictly prohibit elected officials from using the program for their campaign efforts, and DOLE field offices are directed to prevent any form of political endorsement during orientations. But will this be enough?
Experience tells us that electoral regulations, no matter how well-intended, are often circumvented. It is not uncommon for politicians to find indirect ways to associate themselves with government programs, from distributing materials bearing their names to making suggestive statements about their role in securing funding. Some may even try to pressure program implementers or beneficiaries into showing political loyalty.
The public has a crucial role in ensuring accountability. DOLE has encouraged citizens to report any unauthorized use of TUPAD, and this appeal must not fall on deaf ears. Government programs belong to the people, not to any politician or party. Citizens must remain vigilant and call out attempts to politicize initiatives meant for public welfare.
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has already granted exemptions to TUPAD and other DOLE programs from the election spending ban, recognizing their essential role in social protection. However, this exemption should not be misinterpreted as an open invitation for political appropriation. Instead, it places greater responsibility on DOLE, Comelec, and the public to ensure these programs remain untainted by political maneuvering.
As campaign season intensifies, public service must not be hijacked for political survival. TUPAD and similar programs should fulfill their intended purpose — providing genuine assistance to the disadvantaged — without being reduced to mere campaign tools. Let those who seek public office win on their own merits, not by exploiting government programs meant to serve the people.
