THE ROLE of law enforcement in ensuring a peaceful, orderly, and impartial election process comes under greater scrutiny as the 2025 midterm elections draw near. The recent directive from the Police Regional Office 6, which orders the reassignment of officers with political relatives, is a step in the right direction. However, such measure is only part of a larger, more complex challenge: preventing partisan activities within the ranks of law enforcers and ensuring they are not used as instruments of political gain.
The integrity of any election rests heavily on the neutrality of those entrusted with maintaining peace and order. Police officers are among the most visible agents of the state during election periods, and their actions can significantly impact public perception of the election’s fairness. Unfortunately, history has shown that political figures have, at times, sought to exploit law enforcers to sway election outcomes. From providing undue protection to favored candidates to turning a blind eye to election-related violations, partisan activities among police officers, whether deliberate or through subtle pressure, pose a significant threat to democratic integrity.
The reassignment of officers with relatives running for office is designed to avoid any perception of bias. But this addresses only one dimension of the broader issue. Political influence can manifest in numerous ways, and even without familial connections, some officers may still feel the weight of political expectations from local power brokers. The pressure to take sides, especially in politically volatile areas, can be immense, making it crucial for the Philippine National Police to (PNP) establish stronger safeguards.
One key measure the PNP can implement is to intensify its internal monitoring mechanisms during the election period. Random audits of local police actions, independent oversight by neutral bodies, and increased transparency in operations can help curb the risk of partisan behavior. Additionally, the PNP must strengthen its disciplinary measures, ensuring swift and decisive action against any officer found engaging in partisan activities. Clear guidelines must be reinforced; any form of political interference, no matter how minor, must not be tolerated.
Another crucial aspect is the proper training of police officers on election protocols and the importance of their apolitical role. Regular seminars and briefings on the legal framework governing elections, along with case studies of past infractions and their consequences, will help officers better understand the boundaries of their responsibilities. Such should be complemented by psychological support mechanisms, as officers often face immense stress during election periods, particularly in regions known for intense political rivalries.
The PNP’s leadership must also set an example of impartiality and professionalism. Commanding officers have a critical responsibility to ensure their subordinates adhere to the highest standards of neutrality. This top-down approach to leadership, where fairness and integrity are consistently demonstrated, will trickle down to every level of the police force.
As the political season heats up, the PNP’s resolve will be tested. Preventing partisan activities among law enforcers is no easy feat, but with the right measures in place, the PNP can rise to the challenge.
