Equity in the path towards transport modernization

IN ILOILO City, as in much of the country, the Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) is a push towards safer, more sustainable, and comfortable public transportation. However, beneath the polished surface of modernization lies a complex layer of challenges that affect various stakeholders, particularly those economically vulnerable groups whose livelihoods depend on the traditional jeepney system.

The proposed suspension of the PUVMP points to a significant oversight in the program’s implementation: the need for equity. The disparity in economic capabilities among stakeholders — from small jeepney operators to larger transport cooperatives — calls for a more nuanced approach to modernization. In Iloilo, where daily commute is woven with numerous small operators, the financial burden imposed by the PUVMP is a huge hurdle.

The PUVMP requires operators to surrender individual franchises in favor of joining larger transport cooperatives or corporations. This transition, while theoretically beneficial in reducing carbon footprints and organizing transport routes, mandates significant financial investment: new vehicles under the program cost approximately P2.5 million each. For many individual operators and small groups, this cost is prohibitive, and the support offered by the government — both in terms of financing and transition facilitation — remains insufficient.

Senate President Francis Escudero rightfully criticized the program as “ill-conceived” for the financial burdens it imposes. Meanwhile, voices from the local transport sector, like Manibela Panay United, call for a pause and refinement of the program, arguing that the promise of a P500 daily dividend has failed to materialize, leaving them in precarious financial straits.

Furthermore, the case of the Western Visayas Transport Cooperative (WVTC) bares another issue. Having embraced the modernization call and invested heavily — taking a P200-million loan for purchasing “modernized jeepneys” — the potential suspension of the program threatens their financial survival. It’s a reminder that policies enacted without comprehensive stakeholder engagement lead to severe unintended consequences.

To move forward equitably, the government must recalibrate its approach to the PUVMP. This may involve a phased implementation that allows smaller operators more time to adapt, coupled with real financial support like grants or low-interest loans.

There may also be a local tailoring of the national policy. It is important to recognize the unique needs of localities like Iloilo, and consider exemptions or modifications that align with local economic and social realities.

And yes, there must be safety nets. The government must develop contingency plans for those adversely affected during the transition, ensuring that no one is left behind or pushed out of their livelihood without viable alternatives.

As Iloilo, and the nation at large, strive towards transport modernization, we must remember that true progress is inclusive. The pursuit of a “Bagong Pilipinas” must not come at the cost of its most vulnerable citizens. Let’s steer our public transport modernization efforts not only with the vision of a modern fleet but with a commitment to carrying every Juan along on the journey to a better, fairer future.