SOME events over the weekend prompted a revisit.
There was what appeared to be another “Greg Diaz” stunt. This time, however, toilets were not used as props but a vicious seemingly orchestrated attack on the oldest (110 years) Assumption school in the Philippines, Assumption Iloilo, for simply following the catechism of the Catholic Church which is guaranteed by Section 5, Article 3, the Bill of Rights of the 1987 Constitution and protected by the principle of the separation of the Church and State.
The usual homophobia nonsense and “victim card” gimmicks were used. What makes it rather curious is that after this “stunt” went viral, there were calls from the usual suspects to resurrect the SOGIE Bill which died a natural death after it was rejected by the Senate.
Rather curious indeed, and it smacks of a devious ulterior motive.
An article on metroweekly.com says:
A TEDx speaker has argued that pedophilia should be accepted as “an unchangeable sexual orientation.”
Mirjam Heine presented her talk “Pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation” at the University of Würtzberg in Germany, and said that pedophilia is like any other sexual orientation.
It used to be fairly simple. We have lesbians, homosexuals or gays and bisexuals; a lesbian is a woman (natural woman) who is attracted and prefers to have sex with another woman. Meanwhile, a homosexual man or gay is a man (natural, of course) who is attracted and prefers to have sex with another man.
A bisexual is either a natural man or woman who is attracted and prefers to have sex with both men and women.
Simply put, it was just a matter of sexual preference. Whatever their preference is, they still are a man or a woman.
It took some time but the rest of humanity finally accepted this situation and took it in stride and everyone went on with their merry ways and enjoyed sex with whoever is their preference, be it a man a woman, or both.
There are countries who still look down on this and even considered it a crime but that’s not the norm, and most countries just tolerated the lesbians, gays and bisexuals, accepting them for what they are and not who they go to bed with.
So for a time it was just LGB. And then it got a bit weird as someone added T or transgender, which means someone who identifies and dresses as a woman although he was born a man, and a woman born as one who identifies and dresses up as a man.
And there’s more. The T also stands for transsexual, meaning a natural man or woman who was surgically altered to resemble either a man or a woman. Whatever they turn out to be after surgery, they still remain what they were born as, simply because you cannot alter your DNA.
Excerpts from an article in CNSNews.com:
Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.
From an Aug. 29, 2019 article in www.scientificamerican.com by Sara Reardon:
Massive study finds no single genetic cause of same-sex sexual behavior
Now, a new study claims to dispel the notion that a single gene or handful of genes make a person prone to same-sex behavior.
The analysis, which examined the genomes of nearly half a million men and women, found that although genetics are certainly involved in who people choose to have sex with, there are no specific genetic predictors.
And then some bright boy or girl decided to add Q, meaning queer or questioning. Maybe they think it’s not queer enough, perhaps they wanted to make the obvious more obvious.
Excerpts from a Sept. 5, 2019 article on GetRealPhilippines.com by benigO:
A disturbing fact about the whole LGBTQ+ “movement”: the acronym had progressively grown since the days when it encompassed only sexual preference — LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual). The “T”, presumably covering transgenders and transsexuals, was later added. Then “Q”, standing for “queer”, which seems to be redundant with the classes represented by the earlier four letters. The “+” sign then literally made the acronym open-ended to allow the “movement” to add scope to their “cause” arbitrarily and with impunity.
This brings us to the rather confronting question mainstream society asks the LGBTQ+ “movement”: Where does it end?
The “+” addendum to their “cause” does not provide much promise that this question will be answered anytime soon.
The LGBTQ+ “movement” has become a victim of its own nebulous semantics and scope greed and, as is now evident today, unwittingly starts to invade the space of their erstwhile allies, the Feminist “movement”.
We’ve come full circle to see women being victimized by men again. These men just happen to be dressed as women.
Yes, indeed, where does it end? The + might next include “penguins” or “one-eyed midgets” perhaps a “fig tree” and, God forbid, “P” for pedophiles.
There is a scientific and logical reason why nature only provided for a male and female sex – it is for the propagation and survival of our specie. The natural man and natural woman must have sex to reproduce humans. Without that, in time humans will become extinct.
A surgically altered man and woman cannot reproduce another human being; it will mean the end of humanity.
Take note, to be a woman one must have a vagina, uterus and ovaries and capable of giving birth to another human being, while a man must have a penis , scrotum and testicles and capable of producing sperm. What defines your sex is what’s between your legs and not what you fancy yourself to be./PN
