INFRASTRUCTURE is the backbone of any modern society. Roads, bridges, and flyovers are a testament to our growth, but they also come with their challenges. The Ungka flyover, having previously shown signs of vertical displacements, raises questions about safety standards and the balance between commuting convenience and commuter safety.
Upon its reopening on Sept. 22, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Region 6, under the leadership of Engr. Sanny Boy Oropel, showcased a commendable effort in its monitoring practices for the P680-million flyover. A âquadruple run of surveysâ isnât just a routine check â itâs a rigorous method, assuring the public that their safety isnât taken lightly. With four comprehensive re-evaluations of the structure, the DPWH has essentially quadrupled its efforts to ensure that no stone is left unturned when it comes to assessing the flyoverâs stability.
However, no amount of reassurances can quell the anxiety of a citizen who is aware of a structureâs past issues. Words need to be backed by consistent action, transparency, and timely communication.
The reopening decision, as Oropel emphasized, was based on substantial data and in-depth consultations. Nut it is crucial that this meticulousness is sustained. The immediate shutdown policy on detection of any displacement speaks about their commitment. Yet, while the goal is the safety of all commuters, one canât help but wonder: Why take the risk in the first place?
The ease of traffic in the Ungka area since the flyoverâs reopening is undeniable. Congestion, especially during peak hours, can be a thorn in the side for many, and the DPWHâs efforts in alleviating such issues should be lauded. But is this relief worth the potential risk, especially when incidents like an ambulance hitting the gantry on the day of reopening occur?
The Ungka flyover situation underscores the delicate balance authorities have to strike between convenience and safety. While DPWH Region 6 has laid out contingency measures, ongoing vigilance, public involvement, and clear communication are key.
After all, infrastructure is not just about cement and steel, but the lives and livelihoods that depend on it.
