MECHANIZATION has become an integral part of modern agriculture system in the country, which is in consonance with the objectives of the country’s Agriculture chief.
There are, however, questions that must be addressed regarding the quality and integrity of machines intended for Filipino farmers and fisherfolk, the backbone of Philippine economy being an agricultural nation.
We should consider several factors to be able to provide the farmers and fisherfolk with the right machine or equipment, first things first – how many years should a machine or farming equipment last?
There are several areas that must be considered, such as quality, workmanship, durability, design, and service of a particular machine.
Then, who are the qualified persons or entities that can professionally monitor the performance of these machines to maintain quality and service?
Since most farmers have their farmlands located in far-flung areas, will this sector have an assurance that their machines can be repaired if ever breakdowns occur?
If standards of machines will be lowered just to accommodate mediocre suppliers or manufacturers, are we going to sacrifice the welfare of the Filipino farmers?
It can be noted that even President Duterte had earlier emphasized that quality should come first before the price.
The goal should be to raise the standards of manufacturing or importing processes, and not to lower it.
I believe that it is incumbent on the manufacturing sector to reach the standards that the government may prescribe, not for an agency to lower its standards just to accommodate certain manufacturers or suppliers.
Officials should aim to provide the agricultural sector with the best possible machines and equipment that can give many years of service and benefits.
Plans of downgrading standards is in violation of protecting the rights of the Filipino farmers and fisherfolk to be able to have durable, quality and long-lasting machines – concerned officials should be sane enough to know the difference.
With the positive leadership of the Agriculture chief in the implementation of various government projects, like for instance his “Ani at Kita” initiative that resulted in the growth of the agriculture sector, recent undermining developments, however, may dampen the positive outlook and enthusiasm in the continuance of future agricultural projects.
Bidding processes where only suppliers with previous experiences and track records in the supply or manufacture of such equipment or items should be maintained – not downgrading standards just to accommodate mediocre suppliers.
This is not to insinuate malicious doubts in the so-called downgrading of standards or requirements, but a humble prayer for the Agriculture chief to conduct an audit on records or documents of suppliers or manufacturers, and inventory of machines and equipment delivered in the different regions of the country.
Mechanization and how the agriculture sector can use it to be competitive in the global market should always be the priority.
Concerned government agencies and organizations should focus on working together to enhance farm productivity and efficiency to achieve food security and increase farmers’ income, especially now that we are in the midst of a pandemic./PN
