[av_one_full first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’ animation=”]
[av_heading heading=’WHISTLEBLOWER ‘ tag=’h3′ style=’blockquote modern-quote’ size=” subheading_active=’subheading_below’ subheading_size=’15’ padding=’10’ color=” custom_font=”]
BY ERICK SAN JUAN
[/av_heading]
[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=”]
Is Marxism dead?
PRAY that the Obama/Clinton/global elitist cabal haven’t found the Marxist way to compromise the promise of the recent US presidential elections, because it’s still a long way between now and the Jan. 20, 2017 inauguration.
Will there be a coup even before the president-elect takes its oath of office as the new US President?
In the article, Doug Hagmann wrote that now, Hillary Clinton and her Marxist supporters were threatening “our Representative Republic through the petition website Change.org.”
Immediately following Donald Trump’s election victory, a petition was launched to sway the Electoral College to “make Hillary Clinton president on Dec. 19.”
The Electoral College will meet and vote on Dec. 19, 2016, to certify the Trump victory as defined within the US Constitution. Remember, the United States is a Representative Republic and not a democracy, no matter how many times journalists want to change the constitution through language and the repetitiveness of their lies.
Here’s the rest of what Hagmann wrote:
“It is typical for the Clintons and those in their camp to do the exact opposite of what they say publicly. This has been proven through the Wikileaks release of Hillary Clinton’s speeches to big money interests behind closed doors confirming that what she says and does in public is not consistent with what she says to (and does for) her private, big dollar supporters and special interest groups.
“Unable to comprehend such duplicity and blinded by their idolatry, these useful idiots, including the Hollywood elite are pushing for the Electors of the Electoral College to cast their ballots for Clinton on Dec. 19, 2016. They believe that they have the chance to change the outcome of the election, an event that would surely throw this already heavily divided country into a very real civil war, something the Marxists Progressives have been longing for. Sounds familiar! In fact, my own government insider admitted as much exactly as I have documented in my previous reports.
“As to the petition to the Electoral College, it should be noted that they currently have over 2.2 million “signatures” and are gaining on their goal of three million.
“No one should think that the globalist power structure, for which Hillary Rodham Clinton is the face, will willingly cede their power. They will not go quietly into the night — unless a secret concession will be OK’d by incoming President Trump as told. Instead, they will utilize the tactics of their patron saint, Saul Alinsky, whose book Rules for Radicals was dedicated to Lucifer himself. We are seeing this play out on the streets of Portland, Los Angeles, New York and other cities in between.”
***
If we have liberation theologists’ and Maoists’ support thru the National Democratic Front, Communist Party of the Philippines and New People’s Army, in America it’s the secret funds of China through pro-Beijing big business Chinese based in the US funding the Marxists. We have to remember that the same Chinese block supported the presidency of Bill Clinton. So it’s a no-no this time from the Zionists who really control America. I was even shocked to know that some agit-props in the US are NDF based in the US supporting Hillary.
I’m right after all that’s the main reason why the super elites shifted their secret support to Trump.
But is Donald Trump really an anti-establishment president?
The establishment is concerned that Trump would “shake-up” long standing policies under the Democratic and Republican duopoly that benefitted private interest groups.
He promised to build a wall along the Mexican border and temporarily bar Muslim immigrants from entering the United States. He questioned Washington’s longstanding commitment to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies, called for cutting foreign aid, praised President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, vowed to rip up international trade deals, assailed China and suggested Asian allies develop nuclear weapons.
On a positive note, Trump does want a better relationship with Russia that has been fighting alongside the Syrian government forces against the Islamic State. Trump wants the US and Russian forces to work together to defeat the Islamic State. Putin has expressed his willingness to work with Trump to rebuild a relationship that is mutually beneficial.
But what concerns most of us on the other side of the globe is, what does Trump’svictory mean for Asia?An “isolationist America” or more “soft power”?
But as history has shown, the whims of US voters rarely have an impact on US foreign policy, particularly amidst the more subtle use of US “soft power.”
The US policy toward Asia has been a historical, socioeconomic and military continuum marked by a consistent desire for geopolitical and socioeconomic primacy in the region stretching back for over a century.
Since World War II, the US has attempted to contain a rising China, temper and exploit emerging developing nations across Southeast Asia and prevent nations subjugated to US domination (Japan, South Korea and the Philippines) from achieving anything resembling an independent foreign and domestic policy.
This is a continuum that has transcended presidential administrations and congressional shifts of power for decades.
There are a lot to speculate on a Trump administration, like our own president, surprises and maybe blunders will surely occur for days to come.
Just like what President Obama said, “Trump will soon face a sobering reality check.”
Meaning, who’s the real boss? Who rules?/PN
[/av_textblock]
[/av_one_full]
